STRENGTH. STABILITY. CERTAINTY.

NEWS


TargetSolutions’ All-New Course Release Focuses on Firefighter Cancer Prevention

TargetSolutions’ all-new course, NFPA 1851: Cancer-Related Risks of Firefighting, raises awareness of leading causes of cancer in the fire service and instructs personnel on firefighter cancer prevention measures.

Despite the inherent dangers that come with the job of fighting fires and saving lives from critical situations, cancer remains one of the leading causes of line-of-duty deaths in the fire service. This silent killer has been linked to specific carcinogenic agents and was proven to lurk in unexpected places, such as firefighters’ own personal protective equipment (PPE).

To help reduce the cancer risks of firefighting, TargetSolutions is proud to release an all-new course for the fire service: NFPA 1851 – Cancer-Related Risks of Firefighting.

“TargetSolutions recognizes just how serious of an issue this is for today’s fire service,” said Marc Scheipe, who serves as TargetSolutions’ executive vice president. “With that understanding comes a responsibility to create training courses that can make a difference. This course outlines the importance of care and cleaning for turnout gear, how to maintain and inspect PPE (personal protective equipment), and best practices for decontamination, isolation, and reporting of equipment-related issues. The course goes a long way to educate fire service members on how they can mitigate risk.”

Course Overview

Based on the 2014 NFPA standard on Selection, Care, and Maintenance of Protective Ensembles for Structural Fire Fighting and Proximity Fire Fighting, NFPA 1851 – Cancer-Related Risks of Firefighting delivers valuable lessons in firefighter cancer prevention. This two-hour course was authored by fire service instructor and subject matter expert, Paul Costello, who details current information regarding firefighter cancer risks and explains important measures in ensuring safety.

Course Objectives

After completing TargetSolutions’ NFPA 1851 course, personnel will be able to achieve the following:

  • Interpret important terminology as it relates to the NFPA 1851 Standard
  • Explain how protective ensembles interfaces intersect with organs and the lymphatic system
  • Explain how protective ensembles interfaces intersect with organs and the lymphatic system
  • Recognize known carcinogenic agents and cancers associated with the fire service industry
  • Employ best practices to reduce the risk of occupationally-related cancers
  • Comprehend current legislation as it relates to fire-service-cancer diseases and diagnoses

These important topics are covered in 13, video-driven lessons and are guided by an in-course instructor. To ensure personnel can employ these best practices, frequent in-course quizzes and an end-of-course exam test for comprehension.

“Collectively, professionally, we’ve known that there was a correlation between firefighting and cancer for many years. This intrinsic knowledge that the profession has harbored is based on our own observations and losses to cancers at rates that seemed higher than those experienced outside of the fire service,” Costello said. “In the last few years, the data has become increasingly clearer, not only validating the correlation to firefighting, but in many instances the causation of several cancers as well.”

Originally published here. TargetSolutions’ all-new course, NFPA 1851: Cancer-Related Risks of Firefighting, raises awareness of leading causes of cancer in the fire service and instructs personnel on firefighter cancer prevention measures. Despite the inherent dangers that come with the job of fighting fires and saving lives from critical situations, cancer remains one of the leading causes of line-of-duty […]

2-Day Organization Strategic Decision Making Seminar

Who Is Responsible for Organizational Strategic Decision Making?

What if there was a way we could show you how to effectively involve your board or city council, risk manager, and supervisors to solve every critical issue within your organization?

We’re here to inform you that there is a way, and that is Organizational Strategic Decision Making (OSDM). It’s the reason why financial auditors internationally have determined that an organization’s long-term health can be improved through OSDM, which is the foundation of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM). Boards and management have a fiduciary responsibility to implement this process as it is the accepted standard of prudence within the US and internationally as ISO 31000 standards.

Have you addressed the following critical issues in your organization?
  • How to achieve organizational objectives
  • Business continuation plan for key personnel
  • Plan for predictable catastrophic incidents
  • Transition from compliance based safety to building a positive safety culture
  • Every financial audit requires a statement on ERM within your organization
Have you taken into account the following considerations?
  • Proactive management of organizational risk
  • Preparation process for the next generation of leaders
  • This is an international management standard ISO 31000 that is not going away

By institutionalizing ERM, which is scalable to any organization size, you will empower everyone in your organization to identify potential problems.

So How Does ERM Work?

Let’s say an entity has a long term Risk Manager who understands the risks of the organization, has relations with vendors across a wide spectrum and is able to handle any crisis or disaster imaginable. As a professional they pride themselves in having all the answers. But, what happens when they retire or become unavailable?

Following the ERM process, they would bring in subject matter experts from every department within the entity and as a group define every risk issue within the organization. With a risk register in hand the group would assess the frequency and severity of each risk. The Risk Manager would then delegate the risks to the subject matter experts within the various departments and each would be responsible for defining resolutions to every risk issue thereby disseminating knowledge throughout the organization as opposed to consolidating it in one person. The Risk Manager then becomes a manager of the process as opposed to doing it all themselves.

ERM is a teamwork approach with a continuous improvement process cultivating an environment of sharing knowledge throughout an organization.

How do you learn more about ERM?
  1. Free 40-minute Mission Critical ERM Principles webinar streaming available anytime @ csdpool.com/erm
  2. the CSD Pool is working with Colorado risk management organizations to host a 2-day Workshop on how to implement ERM.

This 2-day Workshop will be presented by PRIMA’s ERM national training faculty, Wendel Bosen and Dorothy Gjerdrum on April 12 and 13 and will be held in Lakewood at West Metro Fire Rescue Training Facility.

The cost is $500 for Trust members and $600 for all others. For Trust members who also CSD Pool members, the cost is $50. A continental breakfast and lunch will be provided for attendees on both days. For more details about this event, visit csdpool.com or email [email protected]. You can register here. If you are a Trust member or a Trust member with Pool membership, please contact us here for your promotion code to receive the special admission pricing.

Who Is Responsible for Organizational Strategic Decision Making? What if there was a way we could show you how to effectively involve your board or city council, risk manager, and supervisors to solve every critical issue within your organization? We’re here to inform you that there is a way, and that is Organizational Strategic Decision […]

What Happens to Our Firefighters

Here’s a hypothetical story. A firefighter has been diagnosed with brain cancer. He has been in the fire service for over twenty years, and after receiving that terrible news, seeks workers’ compensation benefits to help cover the mounting costs of his medication, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation.

What the firefighter and his family don’t realize is how long it can take for a decision to be made regarding whether his claim is accepted or denied. The investigation alone can delay the process for months as the firefighter is asked invasive questions about his family history, employment background, lifestyle, previous home addresses, and medical history. Even if an administrative law judge reaches a decision, the firefighter’s case could still end up going back and forth for years.

Unfortunately, there have been numerous real world cases in which firefighters have gone through this exhausting process only to be denied benefits. Even worse, there have been cases in which injured firefighters have passed away before a final decision was reached. Not only does this affect the firefighter, it also places the financial burden on the surviving family. This is the primary reason why the CFHC Trust created our Cancer Program.

The Trust strives to deliver payouts within 10 days of confirmation of a diagnosed cancer. That means the firefighter in our story would have received a cash payment based on the type and stage of his brain cancer, because it is one of the five covered cancers. There would have been no interrogation by insurance adjusters, no months and months of delay. He and his family could focus on what matters most—fighting his cancer and healing, so that he can get back to life and back to work.

Fire departments in Colorado now have the opportunity to provide their firefighters with stability and certainty in those difficult times. That alone can help improve morale and department cohesion. Right now, many workers’ compensation providers are giving fire departments financial incentive to join the Cancer Program. These include Pinnacol Assurance and the Colorado Special Districts Pool. For more information on their programs contact your workers’ compensation provider.

If you’d like to chat with us about getting started with the Cancer Program, click here to request a quote or feel free to contact us.

Here’s a hypothetical story. A firefighter has been diagnosed with brain cancer. He has been in the fire service for over twenty years, and after receiving that terrible news, seeks workers’ compensation benefits to help cover the mounting costs of his medication, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. What the firefighter and his family don’t realize is […]

Colorado State Fire Chief’s Annual Conference

The Colorado State Fire Chiefs will be hosting their annual conference, The Fire Chief’s Leadership Challenge from October 10th to the 13th in Keystone. CFHC Trust Administrator, Joe DePaepe, will be presenting on the voluntary cancer program on Thursday, October 12th at 10 am. Be sure to stop by our booth and say hello! You can find more information about the event here.

The Colorado State Fire Chiefs will be hosting their annual conference, The Fire Chief’s Leadership Challenge from October 10th to the 13th in Keystone. CFHC Trust Administrator, Joe DePaepe, will be presenting on the voluntary cancer program on Thursday, October 12th at 10 am. Be sure to stop by our booth and say hello! You […]

Collaboration Solves Broken Rebuttable Presumption Law for Colorado Firefighters

How do you know when the Workers’ Compensation firefighters’ presumption is broken?

  • Journalists discuss individual WC cancer cases on TV, in print, and online
  • It takes more than a year—or even two years—before a decision is made whether to accept or deny a claim
  • Firefighters pass away before being awarded benefits
  • Cancer cases go before the state Supreme Court

On May 3, 2017, Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper signed into law an opportunity for fire operations to voluntarily opt in to an accident-type policy, which is triggered upon a diagnosis of one of the five statutorily-covered cancers, thus getting out of the state’s rebuttable workers’ compensation presumption of cancer for firefighters.

What happened that led to the new opt-in voluntary program?

In May 2007, Colorado passed a bill that placed a rebuttable workers’ compensation presumption on five cancers. Under this law, the burden of proof moved from the firefighter having to prove the cancer was job-related to the employer now having to prove, with a preponderance of evidence, that the cancer was not job-related.

What was it that proved problematic for Colorado’s 2007 legislation?

Prior to the passage of the presumption law, a plaintiff employee would have spent months preparing their case by gathering evidence. After the law was passed, employers would have to spend a similar amount of time and effort to conduct an investigation of their own. This involved an invasive, time-consuming inquiry into exposures such as:

  • Conditions in the claimant’s current and previous places of residence
  • Environmental conditions at the claimant’s current and past places of residence
  • Hobbies
  • Genetics and family history
  • Lifestyle (smoking, dietary preferences, etc.)
  • Prior medical history

This scrutiny can be considered intrusive, but is necessary to make a reasonable determination whether the claimant has been exposed to known carcinogens linked to the five types of cancers covered in the statute outside of the workplace.

In Colorado, the workers’ compensation statute says the claims adjuster has only twenty days to determine the compensability of a claim or they must file a Tentative Notice of Contest (TNOC), subject to further investigation. An investigation like this simply cannot be completed in 20 days due to the amount of records that need to be obtained and thoroughly reviewed; therefore a TNOC is automatically sent when these claims are received. Many employees react to these notices with both shock and confusion, assuming the letter represents a flat denial. They respond by immediately seeking legal representation.

Now, here we are nine years later with many cases involving an attorney and taking six months to several years for investigation, and a high percentage going to court. There were three cases that finally settled after two years at the state Supreme Court. The rulings were widely seen to be in favor of an employer’s right to rebut the presumption with evidence that the cancer was not job-related. Everyone agreed that there had to be a better way to resolve this difficult issue. Handling the majority of an estimated 180 cancer claims over a nine year period in a hearing room has not worked for anyone.

In 2011, as WC rates and loss experience continued to compound and cause premiums to soar, a collaborative effort had already begun with the Colorado State Fire Chiefs (CSFC) and the Colorado Professional Fire Fighters (CPFF) agreeing to open a dialogue. In their conversations, they began to look for other ways to cover disease than through workers’ compensation. In 2013 firefighters were looking at a new presumption bill for heart attacks to be introduced in the 2014 legislation. The CPFF already had their legislation drafted but were willing to talk to the CSFC.

In early 2013, a group of stakeholders asked the administrator of the Colorado Special Districts WC public entity pool, to facilitate. We sat down and started with what the stakeholders did not like about the way things worked in general, and then moved to address these issues with solutions. By focusing on avoiding the problems with the cancer presumption, we found an easy-to-administer accident-type policy format that served everyone’s needs. CPFF felt at the end of the process that if this worked they would consider amending the 2008 WC presumption of cancer statute in favor of an accident-type program. This then became the motivation for the Chiefs and the workers’ compensation pools to make the program work.

In an interesting twist with the heart program, when this proposed mandatory legislation was introduced with both the union and the management association in lock step at the capital, the City Municipal League objected on the grounds that this was an unfunded mandate. In response, the CPFF sought assistance from the State who determined that solving cardiac issues for firefighters was deemed an important safety issue and earmarked $900,000 to reimburse fire operations that met the coverage criteria within the legislation.

For the cardiac program, we started with an insurance industry off-the-shelf solution appropriately priced, but found that underwriters got cold feet. Every accident market approached was skeptical of their ability to deliver our custom product in the time needed. This meant we had to be creative and restructure Multiple Employer Trust laws to accommodate a facility. We built our own program which kept the funds in Colorado, a concern of the governor, and was owned and managed by the members. This solution produced twice the benefit at a reduced cost. Three years later, the program covers one- third of Colorado firefighters. It has paid 90 percent of the 21 submitted claims within 10 days of completed claim form. Rejected claims simply did not meet eligibility requirements.

With the cardiac program working so well, all involved parties became confident that this model could work to solve the presumption issue for cancer as well. Since no funding was available we had to analyze how this accident coverage might work on a voluntary basis where fire operations could obtain coverage under an accident policy and not be liable under the earlier presumption statute. This meant that if a department ever left the program, they would fall back under the 2007 presumption law. Additionally, any firefighter working for a participating department can still file a workers’ compensation claim for cancer but they would have to do it under the 2006 pre-presumption workers’ compensation statute where the burden of proof falls on the employee. We structured it so any benefit received in that scenario would be offset by benefits received under the accident program.

Both of these programs work because our only goal is to address the issues with the presumption rule and apply solutions from other programs that work well. We do not provide health care, retirement, disability, death or spouse/dependent coverage. We simply award a cash benefit based on a diagnosis and an indication of severity to reimburse the anticipated out-of-pocket expenses. Cash awards are paid out over a period of time with limited conditions or offsets. The firefighter is encouraged financially to return to work. The awards are intended to reimburse the firefighter up front for the value of benefits given up under WC and are, for the most part, not taxable.

Employer’s Gains on Cancer Presumption:
  • Elimination of unlimited liability of a firefighter to come back to the department to file a cancer claim once they leave employment
  • No extended period of investigation leaving firefighter without a source of income or question on who is paying the medical bills
  • Payouts capped at $250,000 at highest level
  • Self-insured entities eligible for lower self-insured retentions and 15% to 20% reduced rates
  • Firefighters are incentivized to return to duty
  • Significant percentage of litigation cost savings
  • Elimination of perceived wedge issue between management and labor
Firefighter’s Gains on Cancer Presumption
  • No invasive investigation
  • Payment based on type and stage of cancer
  • Payments start within 10 days of completed claim form
  • Twice as many claims accepted funding same cancer cost as in prior 10 years
  • No offsets other an if a WC claim is filed under 2006 statute
  • Line of duty status as a condition of this program
  • No longer have to sue employer for equitable payment
  • Payments with consideration gained from reduced litigation cost
  • Not taxable, except for rehabilitation payments

The newly created Cancer program was launched on July 1, 2017. 2000 firefighters through 45 departments were founding members. Roughly 25% of the eligible paid firefighters and 10% of the eligible volunteers have signed up for the new program at the date of the writing of this article. The Board of Directors for the public entity pool we administrate has reimbursed the cost of this coverage in full while another WC Pool is considering its options. Commercial carriers have also outlined considerable discounts for their participating members effective January 1, 2018.

Recent pro-employer rulings in the state Supreme Court may embolden some fire departments to stay the course with the existing statutory model, but that flies in the face of potential public outcry over not doing the right thing for their firefighters. First responders are held in the highest esteem by everyone, from children to the elderly. We feel that is motivation enough. Garry Briese, Executive Director for the Colorado State Fire Chiefs Association, calls this program a “historic first-in-the-nation.” Management and labor came together to collaborate on an issue that was intended to benefit firefighters that was fraught with problems. We are all excited to see what successes lay ahead.

Joseph DePaepe CPCU, CIC
Trust Administration
Colorado Firefighter Heart and Cancer Benefits Trust
[email protected] How do you know when the Workers’ Compensation firefighters’ presumption is broken? Journalists discuss individual WC cancer cases on TV, in print, and online It takes more than a year—or even two years—before a decision is made whether to accept or deny a claim Firefighters pass away before being awarded benefits Cancer cases go before […]